Monday, June 28, 2010

What Does A Womans Private Look Like With Herpes

Expulsion of a disabled young man, shame

Between BA and managing my new heritage, I have been very busy lately, so I left little room for comment on the news. One case was particularly challenged and I would return it, because it has relatively little coverage in the media: a few months ago, a young Kosovar 15 years and his family were expelled from France because they were undocumented. So far, nothing exceptional, but this young man had multiple disabilities, which reveals several things about the politics of our country.

Shame is the feeling I get in finding what is going on: a family that can go with impunity kosovarde in France without any paper and remain there for years without anyone reacting. Instead, she was even able to take advantage of our health system at the expense of the Communist taxpayer by proving the same it is more than necessary to do away with Social Security, which attracts foreigners among us who seek to enjoy.

The case might have ended here with the intervention copy of Eric Besson, but was not counting on associations leftists and right-of-l'hommistes who built the case hairpin to finance care of the young man in his home country! Doctors have had to travel at the expense of taxpayers, medicines were supplied free of charge but that of course when we are in times of stringency and it would be good to avoid unnecessary expenses.

Enough to measure the assistantship in France: not only our own residents can be cared for without having to pay and therefore no need to work, but also the rest of the world is found in benefit at our expense! He should learn to value the work that family and the parents start to get a job and work hard to care for their son, rather than relying on taxpayers of a country that is not even theirs. France did not intend to treat all the misery in the world!

Friday, June 4, 2010

Sears Fotos NavideƱas

The pension problem

There is much talk of pensions at the moment, forgetting talking about essentially leftist media obliges. It's good to talk "problem" because the pension is indeed a problem. But the action of government, far from wanting to remove it, simply go around trying to "save" pensions. Why bother to save a problem?

The very idea of retirement is a communist and should be deleted. Today is deprived of liberty who want to work after 60 years, forcing those who work the most (the rich, so) to fund inactivity. It's pure and simple handouts. Pushing back the retirement age is far from being a solution. We have the right to work until age 65, age 70, but after?

The solution is the complete removal of our retirement system. It has largely proved ineffective and has no raison d'etre. Why bother to ban a 70 or 80 years from working? Many wish they could do. They say that having a Rolex 50 years, successful life. But then what? Is it enough? Are we expected to stop working once it's done? Surely not. Let us rather admirable example of people like Serge Dassault, who, at age 85, continues to earn the job: entrepreneur, Senator, Mayor, gentleman ...

And why should we continue to give money to people who do not work? Someone will be able to save resourceful throughout his life rather than begging for retirement. Investment in pension funds, for example, ensures its future, and at the same time, create wealth, because money, it works! Far from being a "retreat" by capitalization, such a system can generate a lot of money for those who entrust their money, of course, but also for those who manage these funds! It is a much better system than the "distribution", we should rather call it "theft".

That bottom most real wealth creators. Once an age where manual labor such as trader or entrepreneur becomes a bit too challenging, far from leaving the world of work, they rely on the wealth they have acquired to engage in rent. They are thus useful to society and create wealth. They are the ones that should be taken as an example rather than to tax them again and again with the FSI or the income tax, while two highly unfair.