few weeks ago, I dared say publicly that the site had been purchased by the city at a price well above what has been done elsewhere.
What did not I say! Once again, once again, the Mayor who supports neither the criticism nor the contradiction has engaged in a diatribe against me by the City Council, challenging this assertion, showing a document with GIAT prices and surfaces sold by GIAT for all its sites, asking his majority: "You I want to give you some details like that! You want the details [...] I'll give you! "... His most excitedly shouting" yes, yes! "As in the circus.
The mayor read so the document.
Only here ...
First I wrote to the Mayor for the document which he said the City Council that he had "obviously authorization Giat industry" for read. Refusal.
Then I wrote to the Directorate GIAT for it. GIAT recently sent me the paper said.
This document may be considered as the minutes of the Municipal Council of 20 September in which it is stated:
"Regarding the acquisition of the town of Tarbes, which it either land or buildings (90,000 m2 of buildings and 20 hectares of land), whether in the overall price or price per square meter, We are below all other disposals by far.
; ; ;
-Sagem: 8.9 ha to 2.8 M €
-Vallourec: 2.5 ha to 1.2 M €
-Tarbes: 23 acres for 3.8 M €
-Bourges : 13.3 ha for 3 million €
-Cusset: 6 acres for 2.6 M €
-Satory: 9.8 million hectares for 8265 €
-Roanne: 17 ha 6177 M €
Saint-Chamond: 29 acres for € 7 million
St. Etienne: 18 acres for € 6 million
-Toulouse: 26 hectares for 278 million € "
But he added almost honest" good, of course, c ' is Toulouse.
The problem is that I asked the Mayor of Toulouse and the price is not 278 million but ... 26.7 million! Figure confirmed by the document transmitted by GIAT.
You talk about a difference ....
In these circumstances, the first things that we can do is to seriously doubt the veracity of the figures given by the Mayor, and in any case, his way of reading them.
But we do not have the habit of just one point of view we also want to contact the councils concerned are almost all of the Left in order to obtain more information !
And what do we see? Well, naturally, that the figures we can make them say what they want, with varying degrees of honesty.
A-mayor has not said it all!
First, that the Mayor has not said it all! For example, he does not speak of Le Mans for instance. Or at Le Mans, information taken from the municipality, we know that the city has, among other things, purchased 30 hectares (7 more than Tarbes) for ... 2.6 million € or 1.2 million € less than Tarbes! It's per square foot, half the price Tarbes! The mayor has even lied when he announced that the town of Tarbes had bought 23 hectares for 3.8M to €! The town of Tarbes has actually bought that 20 acres for 3.8 M € at Giat, the 23 acres mentioned by the Mayor is the sum of acres purchased Giat and Vallourec.
B-comparisons do not
After that comparison is not right if we stick to the numbers: because these sales are not at all the same situations . Especially when we think of very delicate issue of pollution: how to compare the situation of Tarbes is a totally got GIAT for abatement with:
- Le Mans where the site was cleaned up before sale, and where we can make a conversion, including habitat (which is not the case in Tarbes!)
; - Cusset where the seller remains liable towards third parties for damages that could be caused by damage related to pollution of site where an ad 'hoc remediation "involving State, GIAT and the city was put in place?
- Toulouse, where the seller has agreed to:
Conduct a study-type approach to analysis of residual risks
Reimburse the purchaser of are incurred by the latter for the rehabilitation advocated
Accepted revoyure clause in case of discovery of pollution after the sale.
And what is true for clearance, so is for the demolition of buildings!
Finally, comparison is not right and we can see, if, instead of being obsessed with the sale price, it puts it in relation to the local market for industrial land.
From this point of view, how to compare Tarbes who bought at 19 euros per m2 when the Midi-Pyrenees, validates a price of 20 euros per m2 for business parks Tarbes and Toulouse who bought at 95 euros m2 but where land prices "to accommodate" range from 40 euros per m2 150 euros per m2 for housing!
To close this discussion on the purchase price of the site or remediated or demolished site of Tarbes and to show that the purchase was not "good deal" is said for mayor, you can take one last example: Arsenal de Brest. Of course, let's be honest: this arsenal of Brest was not for GIAT! But just to tell you: comparison is not right ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment