Thursday, February 17, 2011

Everlast Exercise Bikes

Another tragedy caused by the Islamization of France

Once again, a sad fact various should lead us to question the ever largest of Islam in France. Few leftist media have pointed to silence the truth, but the shooting took place outside a kebab, if evidence is that such anti-establishment Republican has nothing to do in France. When will they ban?

Newspapers also silent origins of brothers, which speaks volumes. Had they been French-born, no doubt the case would have made the very clear and should have their color, but because it is foreign (which is quite obvious since it is not specified), we prefer silence to continue to believe in "live together" and not to shock the associations' anti-racist ". Enough self-righteousness!

Saturday, February 5, 2011

How Long Can An Anorexic Survive ?



Calories In A Duck Chow Mein

The scandal of the Mediator, the role of Afssaps and conflicts of interest.

We are witnessing an event of some importance: the consideration by the Government to certain deviations in the drug industry.

"Cyclothymia and Truth" has long adhered to the warnings given by PRESCRIBE, the work of the investigative journalist Stéphane Horel or Pharmacritique excellent blog (see the websites in the "links").

Scandal Picks enabled the public and especially to the health authorities to realize certain present tendencies.

links between laboratories and health authorities, doctors and scientific textbook publishers will be more easily identifiable when professors Even and Debre chosen by the President of the Republic have submitted their report to the Minister of Health, Mr. Bertrand. Take time to watch this interview: from = # http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xah2j7_philippe-even_news embed

The conflict of interest destroys the confidence of the patient's doctor and we must ask the right questions and require full transparency.

Afssaps, whose manager has more power, has published a list of drugs "under guard" including several used in psychiatry: Anti-depressants (fluoxetine, sertraline), Ritalin Concerta, Quasym, Stablon, Stilnox, Zypradhera, Cymbalta, Noctram, Rohypsol ... Here is the official list
complete: http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/sciences/sante/la-liste-des-77-medicaments-surveilles-par-l-afssaps_957770.html

These drugs are not prohibited but are subject to "enhanced surveillance" of the health authorities ...

I am glad that people who suffer from bipolar disorder or cyclothymia can find answers to their questions and sometimes effective therapies.

However, I remain very cautious on the label "manic" or "bipolar" because that ends the temperament and where the pathology starts?

Personally, I think we need to evaluate the episodes, TS, hospitalizations, serious shortcomings in terms of professional life, an episode of depression (not depression) and mania-hypomania (not hyperthymic).

Drugs are a big help in helping patients, but many questions remain unanswered: Who

takes these drugs, especially when and for how long? What side effects? Same problem with children and adolescents ( http://www.afssaps.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Traitements-par-antidepresseurs/Traitement-par-antidepresseurs/ (offset) / 0 ).

WMA and "off-label" should be discussed and clarified in my opinion. We do not like the English guideline (NICE and the reference at the bottom of the depression on p.21: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG90/NICEGuidance/pdf/English ) or U.S. Senator Grassley!

recomande So I very carefully and take the time to learn.

You will find in this blog and in my synthesis published in 2009 Pharmacritique ( http://pharmacritique.20minutes-blogs.fr/archive/2009/06/23/cyclothymie-et-psychodiversite-les-traitements-en- question.html ), leads to serious reflection.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Old Mera Naam Jokar Hotseen

The Maghreb, which causes problems

Contrary to what we want to believe the leftist media, there is nothing to celebrate in the "revolutions" in Tunisia, Algeria or Egypt. Existing leaders, whether Ben Ali, Bouteflika mufassir or previously shared stability in the region by limiting the actions of Islamists and ensuring a modern economy, freed from a labor code too heavy reason which many companies were choosing to settle there.

But anyone interested in Islam knows that Muslims can not live in peace, and always seek to impose Sharia wherever they are. Predominate in these countries, overthrow their governments to impose an Islamist state was inevitable! We had already seen such actions occur in France during the riots in the suburbs, then become lawless zones where the Republic no longer has its rightful place: Halal meat, kebabs and other mosques have imposed their own laws.

Too much left to Muslims the right to do what they like, it comes to these situations causing numerous deaths. But our media do-gooders will always say it's a great thing by refusing to see the truth! And that is the police, yet guarantor of peace, which is responsible for the deaths! Having myself spent several holidays in Tunisia and even having seen firsthand the pyramids of Egypt, I am even more aware of the situation these journalists sores leftists who never leave their lofts in Paris! It may, however

salute the exemplary behavior of our government, and especially Michele Aliot Marie, who was able to choose the forces for good and democracy rather than yield to pressure from Marxists. It even comes to reproach him for having made trips to Tunisia! It might be better to keep warm in her house and she said not knowing what she's talking? For leftists, apparently, yes.

Rather than rejoice, the situation in North Africa rather should alert us by showing us what could happen in France shortly, when Muslims become the majority! Projections show that all this will happen in just a few decades. Unfortunately, the elite right-of-l'hommiste refuse to see reality and those who attempt to alert public opinion, as Lay or Riposte Eric Zemmour are muzzled, prohibited media and dragged in Stalinist trials. Remain vigilant!

Friday, January 7, 2011

What Is An I.chi Straightener From Jcpenney

Jacques Seguela shocked once again the self-righteous


Seguela: "Chinese workers are happy"
sent LePostfr . - The News International video.

Here's someone who dares to tell the inconvenient truths! But faced with the leftist media who always want more money without doing anything, this kind sentence of discomfort. Serge Dassault as praising the Chinese system where people enjoy working at the point of sleeping in their factories, Jacques Seguela proves once again that the SMIC is useless and can remove up to pay for French workers their fair value. If they love their job, then they will work more to earn more with pleasure! But it must get rid of Marxist thought which means that the work is necessarily constrained by the wicked rogue bosses, what is wrong! That's why initiatives such as the MEDEF Like with my box are particularly interesting, as their business and work values at the heart of life.

Speeding Ticket With A French Driving License

persecuted Christians in general indifference

As often, Christians are persecuted by Muslims. This happens in Islamic countries, of course, but also at home, in France Islamized. And yet, nobody talks, because Christians can not be victims to the media leftists. If the victims were foreigners, everyone would be outraged and would have made the new one, but then none of this.

Christians of the Orient, however, are extremely courageous decision to leave in countries dominated by extremists, to open their eyes to their bloody religion and convert to the Truth, let them see Christ as the only messiah, it takes a lot of work. But Muslims are savages who respect nothing and who seek only to conquer all of Europe.

And then they want to be respected in France! They start by respecting the Christians in their country! It is not surprising that similar behavior with Muslims can be rejected or attacked by the French exhausted to see their country become Islamic republic. Well done for them! But anyway, attacks on Muslims remain still very rare, whereas the reverse, however, occurs regularly, how many "suburban youth" Maghreb ready to lynch him by the French anti-white racism? But these stories never make the headlines and it is preferred that these "youths" are victims, it's not their fault, see they did nothing. Associations right-of-l'hommistes are ready for all the lies to conceal the truth.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Source Of Cydia Pokemon Rom Hacks

Marine Le Pen: overflow?

Once again, Marine Le Pen simply show the truth and say aloud what the French say softly, and all the political and media leftists him jump above. What has she done wrong by revealing that Muslims want to submit the country to their religion? It is a reality that can no longer deny.

But there is one point on which it could have been more relevant: a comparison with the Occupation. Indeed, there are few similarities between Islam and the Occupation during the war of 39-45. During the latter, the Germans did not impose a religion at all and knew respect the Christian roots of our country. Their religion was the same as us, which helped quite a lot of integration. They does not strangle the sheep in the bathtubs and did not require the construction of mosques and minarets. While it sullies the memory of people like Marshal Petain, who saved France from a terrible war, not to honor him than to compare it to Muslims.

Conversely, Muslims now want to impose halal food everywhere to wear the burqa and women do not respect our country is to insult us. Municipal left wallow in collaboration with the enemy that lurks, and only a few resistant such as Marine Le Pen, of course, but also journalists and associations politically incorrect as Eric Zemmour, Ivan Rioufol, Riposte Lay Bivouac ID or dare to tell the truth. The Islamic invasion suffered by France should rather be compared to the murderous Muslim invasions of the eighth century, and his opponents are a bit of Charles Martel in modern times.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Messgae In Christing Card

The last day of the skirt reality

As suggested by the beautiful film The Skirt Day, today is the day finally came, thanks to the feminist Neither whores nor submissive. Far from the usual leftist feminist groups, whose demands are ridiculous, such as equal pay (as if women were creating as much wealth as the men) or positive discrimination (which undermines the merit award) is an association NPNS right that directs its efforts towards something useful, like the fight against immigration. Fadela Amara, the founder, was even present government of Nicolas Sarkozy, proof that it is not a leftist.

The day of the skirt is therefore possible to claim values abandoned due May 68. Formerly, women could not wear pants, thus ensuring a healthy society based on family values. But with the abolition of this law (among others) is the end of moral values were the greatness of our country which began: divorce, homosexuality, women's work, unbridled sexuality, PACS, end of chastity ...

is for us to remind this blessed time and upgrade the old values that the day of the skirt is an important symbol: if in this day, all women wear skirts, so you can relive bit of nostalgia for that era. Of course, this is the moment that a non-binding proposal, not yet the day of the skirt as intended in the film, and where its port is imposed on all women, but it ' is a good start. Perhaps, in a few years, will there be daily and the day became enshrined in law.

But beware, do not fall into the opposite extreme and widespread miniskirts and attire of prostitutes. It is critical that this day is moderate and the skirt comes down to decent outfits. Some girls might be tempted to take the opportunity to dress "sexy", it will not be surprising that they do violate or whistle. Fortunately, the law of Nicolas Sarkozy on passive soliciting is there to prevent abuse.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Leopard Vest Ferris Bueller

The greatest scientists dragged through the mud

thinking is not unique havoc In politics, it is also in the scientific world. And again, the "scientifically incorrect" who have the courage to say what nobody else dares say suffer the wrath of other leftists and Marxists who do not want to tell the truth.

This applies first of all Bogdanoff brothers. These two scientists, outstanding in their field, have recently released a book giving clear evidence of the existence of God. But the fundamentalist atheists do not support a mistake, they prefer to defame and benefit out a so-called report to discredit them. It was however finally, thanks to them, and Nicolas Sarkozy, a television science interesting.

Finally, another troublemaker science is Claude Allegre, who was perfectly demonstrated that environmentalists sores told anything by believing in global warming, to make us return to Stone Age. Well now some accuse him of having rigged the so-called graphics of his book!

Being a great scientist in 2010 is very difficult. We could also talk of American Scientists creationists, whose theses are ignored yet solid and mocked by leftists. Why can not we teach as we teach the theory of evolution crazy? Media Stalinists would like to silence them, to apply a right-thinking more in line with their ideas, but at odds with the total reality!

Is Gmc Going To Change Body Style On Yukon

I welcome

Dear Customers,

I welcome you on this blog dedicated to the rehabilitation of the neighborhood of the Arsenal in Tarbes.
This tool aims to introduce greater transparency and restore the truth about the site, formerly owned by Giat, including pollution.
I invite you to leave comments and respond to published articles so that this blog is a place for exchange and debate.

Jean GLAVANY

Thursday, November 4, 2010

What Stores Sell Cajun Injector

refusal partnerships


A- a commitment to participation of all communities


On June 31, 2006, the establishment of Tarbes GIAT closed its doors. Further dramatic consequences on the social and economical, this closure leaves behind a 32-hectare brownfield site at the heart of the city of Tarbes.
Recognizing the major challenge of the future site for the city and its suburbs, all the local authorities wanted to take part in this.
A meeting in the presence of all parties has been held in the Prefecture in September 2006 to initiate a discussion on the purchase and conversion of the site. During this meeting, the Regional Council, represented by Pierre Forgues, the General Council by Francis Fortassin and the Urban Community by Jean Glavany have expressed to the Mayor Tarbes, Gerard Trémège their agreement to participate in the purchase of site under certain conditions (FC testimonials field below).

an era condition: Do not be passive but financial backers associated partners within their respective jurisdictions
2 nd condition: not to participate in the cleanup of the site whereas it was the state to finance this operation must if a change in the nature of use was intended
3 rd condition: the establishment of a comprehensive, coherent, transparent and democratic to develop a project which alone could determine which of the skills of communities would be involved (basically the three communities said the same impulse: "Tell us what you do and you tell how we can help you. "which is logical and consistent: we have never seen a public commitment to support a project ... she does not know!)

The minutes of that meeting stated that the then Secretary General Prefecture cause a further meeting with all stakeholders to clarify the conditions under which they might take.


Testimonials Pierre Forgues and Francis Fortassin :


"The area was quite willing to participate in purchasing the site Giat but only if it is associated with the project and although I had stated at the meeting held in the prefecture. Another meeting was scheduled to establish the modalities of this participation, but this new meeting never took place, the Mayor of Tarbes had decided to buy the site alone. "

Pierre Forgues


The Prefect has met with the Mayor of Tarbes, Pierre Forgues for the Regional Council, Jean Glavany for the city and myself to the General Council. "He asked us if our three communities were likely to intervene financially to the site of Giat. I remember that without us together, we said exactly the same thing: no objection in principle, it was simply to set goals because we did not aim each other and to intervene on all issues. I also remember that the meeting ended on a positive note as we had planned to meet again to discuss the legal form that might take this possible intervention. What is true is also a major and important site for the city and the Department could not leave us indifferent, but the interest of the town of Tarbes to act alone I may have missed ... "

Francis Fortassin


B-a Mayor who wants to act alone

Trémège But Gerard, Mayor of Tarbes against all odds, took the decision to purchase the site without assistance from other communities. He then explains that the city was forced to buy only because the Regional Council, the General Council and the Grand Tarbes had refused to participate. This is totally false as evidenced by the minutes of the meeting held at the prefecture. Appears a second version of the same minutes in which the paragraph stating that a further meeting should be convened to establish conditions of community involvement exists. The new forged minutes and allowed to Gerard Trémège to justify his choice to buy one.


C-the consequences of that decision

This purely arbitrary decision by the Mayor of Tarbes has serious consequences for Tarbes Tarbes and because this operation costs four times more expensive in the city and therefore its people. The town of Tarbes was thus deprived of substantial funding. How to explain when such a decision?
If the Mayor decided to buy one , simply because he wanted to decide alone of the site's future and thus have "exclusive political" Even if this were to be at the expense of his constituents. There was no way for him to involve other communities in this project.

Pokemon Games That You Can Save And Play Agian

V Draft amendment SOP B-


A-The general framework

Following the closure of the mechanical sector of Giat Industries of Tarbes (30 June 2006) The City has embarked on a restructuring of the industrial area consisting of two large wasteland that of GIAT industry and that of the old factory-Hughes Tool, disused since 1981, now private property.
Both sites are former classified installations for environmental protection (ICPE).

The former site of GIAT was the subject of two separate procedures: one was conducted by the former operator in respect of retirement for use industrial, the other by the City for a change of use, that is to say to use to create a sensitive habitat area.
The fallow-Hughes Tool should be a management plan for a change of use by its current owner, the Mondin company Salas, who has planned to implement a habitat area. This management plan does not currently exist because there is no soil analysis was performed.

These two sites are, as BPI, supervised by the environmental code. Their evolution is followed by DREAL. As part of the administrative procedure for cessation of activity or change in use, the administrative authority can impose restrictions on use as public easements necessary then to POS.

Opening these lands to urbanization must take into account the compatibility of use with residual pollution former BPI. This led the City to oversee the licensing of planning by introducing the concept in the regulation of the use is compatible with residual pollution.

Specifically, the project aimed:
¾ to create on the site GIAT areas where the habitat would be allowed (UAA, UAC)
¾ to adapt the Zoning IU as its rules do not fit the organization of industrial buildings preserved. By becoming UIB, the regulation would allow the erection of new buildings or expanding old limit in the public domain in an urban spatially coherent.
¾ plans to establish new alignment on the site.
¾ to remove easements planning now obsolete:
> General Council abandons placeholders 11, 12 and 13
> the operation 112 has no rationale (riprap and shoreline development of Adour by Grand Tarbes).




Quotes For 25th Birthday

IV The political choice: Left / Right two fundamentally opposing


The municipal elections of March 2008 were used to compare two projects are fundamentally different.


A- project presentation of the Left

The Left proposed to create a partnership structure with all the affected communities for shared funding. He was leading a project development and management of future coherent Arsenal quarter. To achieve this overall plan a competition involving several architects had to be organized and submitted to the appreciation of Tarbes Tarbes and through a genuine democratic consultation.
The Left has always advocated a comprehensive project chosen by the people to the site to become a showcase for innovative socially and economically, while respecting the collective memory of the place. The approach advocated by the Left Tarbes was therefore similar to that adopted by Brest Metropole Oceane.


B- site development by the municipality

As we aircraft feared the mayor has never had a comprehensive plan from the beginning, he is unable to present a specific development project. On several occasions we have asked the City Council of us about the future development of the site. We never got satisfaction. In this regard, remember that episode comic projector down when the City Council meeting during which the Mayor should give us that famous plan together that we are still waiting! We also regret that the Mayor has chosen to turn away from civic democracy because we believe that for a site so important historically and geographically, it was essential.
Its sales method for cutting, fitting over the water, shows a total lack of voluntarism that causes permanent contradictions as evidenced by numerous newspaper articles have appeared in recent years.
The mayor said so in the local press on 24-01-2007: "A specialist indoor soccer hopes to open more land, a developer wants to build a residence for students ... a host structure for seniors, " on 16-02-2007: Building 113 "we can imagine a sports arena, it would be phenomenal," Building 112 "installation of a contemporary art space, The 27-07-2007" a residential hotel with 100 rooms, a recreation center for children, a rehearsal hall for the National Theatre "...
So today when the mayor says he was never create a habitat area on the site, we have a little hard to believe. Why bother to change Plan of land then?

Sonicare With Quad Pacer And Battery

III Comparison with the city of Brest


The city of Brest has seen a pattern almost identical to that of Tarbes following a restructuring of military facilities (16 hectares located in downtown buildings and military sites) belonging to the Ministry of Defence. We therefore wanted to compare the two projects and their costs.


A- Brest: a much lower acquisition cost: 19 euros / m2 against 14.6 to Brest!

In Brest, the site of 15.3 hectares was purchased by the Urban Community Brest Metropole Oceane (BMO) for an amount of 2.2 million euros is EUR 06.14 m2. This price includes the cleanup of the site by the State , allowing a clean change of nature in some areas of the site chosen by BMO.
The proposed development site was entered in the Project Agreement State-Region and was able to take advantage of many financing : Europe, State, Regional Council of Britain, the General Council Finistere Brest Metropole Oceane and.

At Tarbes, the city bought 20 acres a cost of 3.8 million euros is 19 euros per m2 , which it is appropriate to add 400 000 euros of interest for delayed payment. This amount was exclusive not clean up the site for a change in the nature of use . The state has undertaken to pay for the remediation of industrial use, contrary to the agreement concluded in Brest. There was no external funding for site development.


B- Brest: transparent management of the cleanup

Regarding remediation, in Brest, a thorough diagnosis has been made by the state and has established an interpretation of state media and a management plan (as required by a circular dated February 8, 2007 ). A arrested ministerie the also came formalize to undertake remediation. The responsibility of the state for cleanup at this site is engaged in 13 years.
In Brest, the state has carried out the cleanup work taking into account the proposed development of the acquirer provided that in certain areas a change in the nature of use (housing ...) .

At Tarbes, the state has conducted a cleanup in order for continuity in the nature of use . no management plan has been made, there is no ministerial order. Studies on pollution of the site exist, but despite our repeated requests, we never had access. It is the opacity fullest even though the problem pollution should be treated with the utmost transparency! Why not be imposed on the state, as was the case in Brest, a much more thorough cleanup?


C-Brest: a method and coherent choices

Brest Metropole Oceane If could conclude such a protocol with the State because his proposed development site has from the beginning been the subject of a plan guide that defines the future use of land and buildings approved by the elected community. BMO has launched a process development zone to compare different projects and to appoint an operator responsible for site development. A ZAC has also been created.
BMO had a comprehensive site and has develop a collective memory for the sake of harmonious integration with surrounding areas, all within a logic of sustainable development. BMO led a coherent and ambitious , 30 000 m2 dedicated to the tertiary sector (commerce, public facilities and cultural), 41 000 m2 dedicated to housing (social housing and housing costs under control). In total more than 1,000 jobs will be created site .

Wholesalers Maybelline.us

II The controversy over revealing the terms of purchase of the site by the city

few weeks ago, I dared say publicly that the site had been purchased by the city at a price well above what has been done elsewhere.

What did not I say! Once again, once again, the Mayor who supports neither the criticism nor the contradiction has engaged in a diatribe against me by the City Council, challenging this assertion, showing a document with GIAT prices and surfaces sold by GIAT for all its sites, asking his majority: "You I want to give you some details like that! You want the details [...] I'll give you! "... His most excitedly shouting" yes, yes! "As in the circus.
The mayor read so the document.
Only here ...
First I wrote to the Mayor for the document which he said the City Council that he had "obviously authorization Giat industry" for read. Refusal.
Then I wrote to the Directorate GIAT for it. GIAT recently sent me the paper said.
This document may be considered as the minutes of the Municipal Council of 20 September in which it is stated:

"Regarding the acquisition of the town of Tarbes, which it either land or buildings (90,000 m2 of buildings and 20 hectares of land), whether in the overall price or price per square meter, We are below all other disposals by far.
; ; ;
-Sagem: 8.9 ha to 2.8 M €
-Vallourec: 2.5 ha to 1.2 M €
-Tarbes: 23 acres for 3.8 M €
-Bourges : 13.3 ha for 3 million €
-Cusset: 6 acres for 2.6 M €
-Satory: 9.8 million hectares for 8265 €
-Roanne: 17 ha 6177 M €
Saint-Chamond: 29 acres for € 7 million
St. Etienne: 18 acres for € 6 million
-Toulouse: 26 hectares for 278 million € "

But he added almost honest" good, of course, c ' is Toulouse.
The problem is that I asked the Mayor of Toulouse and the price is not 278 million but ... 26.7 million! Figure confirmed by the document transmitted by GIAT.
You talk about a difference ....
In these circumstances, the first things that we can do is to seriously doubt the veracity of the figures given by the Mayor, and in any case, his way of reading them.

But we do not have the habit of just one point of view we also want to contact the councils concerned are almost all of the Left in order to obtain more information !
And what do we see? Well, naturally, that the figures we can make them say what they want, with varying degrees of honesty.


A-mayor has not said it all!

First, that the Mayor has not said it all! For example, he does not speak of Le Mans for instance. Or at Le Mans, information taken from the municipality, we know that the city has, among other things, purchased 30 hectares (7 more than Tarbes) for ... 2.6 million € or 1.2 million € less than Tarbes! It's per square foot, half the price Tarbes! The mayor has even lied when he announced that the town of Tarbes had bought 23 hectares for 3.8M to €! The town of Tarbes has actually bought that 20 acres for 3.8 M € at Giat, the 23 acres mentioned by the Mayor is the sum of acres purchased Giat and Vallourec.

B-comparisons do not

After that comparison is not right if we stick to the numbers: because these sales are not at all the same situations . Especially when we think of very delicate issue of pollution: how to compare the situation of Tarbes is a totally got GIAT for abatement with:

- Le Mans where the site was cleaned up before sale, and where we can make a conversion, including habitat (which is not the case in Tarbes!)

; - Cusset where the seller remains liable towards third parties for damages that could be caused by damage related to pollution of site where an ad 'hoc remediation "involving State, GIAT and the city was put in place?

- Toulouse, where the seller has agreed to:

Conduct a study-type approach to analysis of residual risks
Reimburse the purchaser of are incurred by the latter for the rehabilitation advocated
Accepted revoyure clause in case of discovery of pollution after the sale.

And what is true for clearance, so is for the demolition of buildings!

Finally, comparison is not right and we can see, if, instead of being obsessed with the sale price, it puts it in relation to the local market for industrial land.
From this point of view, how to compare Tarbes who bought at 19 euros per m2 when the Midi-Pyrenees, validates a price of 20 euros per m2 for business parks Tarbes and Toulouse who bought at 95 euros m2 but where land prices "to accommodate" range from 40 euros per m2 150 euros per m2 for housing!

To close this discussion on the purchase price of the site or remediated or demolished site of Tarbes and to show that the purchase was not "good deal" is said for mayor, you can take one last example: Arsenal de Brest. Of course, let's be honest: this arsenal of Brest was not for GIAT! But just to tell you: comparison is not right ...

Adult Lacrosse Club California

The BPI's GIAT


1 - History:

The City has a number of expertise. Their existence is known but they remained secret

[ 1999-2001: diagnostic assays of pollution have been carried out in 1999-2001 by the BET Duke Enginneering

[ 2007:
¾ July 19: purchase of the site by the City
¾ September : GIAT gives BURGEAP mission to produce a management plan for non-sensitive (industrial) for termination of activity. This management plan is the circular of February 2007 Department of Ecology and Sustainable Development (MEDD). The circular is clearly on the arrangements for management and redevelopment of polluted sites, so as the BPI.
¾ September : the City asks the BET ANTHEA a new analysis to define the conditions of occupation of the site to use sensitive. She wants to proceed with the development plan proposed by city planners and approved by City Council in 2007 .

Note: The study is ANTHEA place already in the logical use of sensitive and therefore already in the prospect of a revision of the POS with the creation of habitat zone.

[ 2008
¾ February: surrender by ANTHEA its diagnostic use sensitive
> this diagnosis is based on previous studies that, at the request of GIAT, were within the logic of an industrial
> ANTHEA:
- perform further tests on the open parts of urbanization instrumentalities: soil analysis, soil-gas surveys (though no evidence on the possible pollution of groundwater )
- define thresholds of acceptability of the risks involved in using previous studies, cross-national regulatory thresholds, European and global structures and recommendations for public health.
¾ June: ANTHEA furnished by the management plan for a sensitive use
; > acceptability thresholds are exceeded:
; - for the occupation of the former dump site by children and adults in public facilities (around the water tower)
- for individual homes with gardens, with or without recovery of soil on the site of demolished building is currently 124. The acceptability threshold was also exceeded the air quality inside before its demolition
- a point of building 116
- on the entire site for the use of individual gardens and green spaces nonoverlapping (diffuse pollution: arsenic and lead).

Note: It seems that the management plan included measures GIAT recovery (rail system infrastructure, buildings, renew green areas on the top soil)

> p roposals of ANTHEA
- keeping blankets and recovery site
- when servitudes for treatment of pollution is not feasible, technically or economically.

[ 2009
January 21: official by sending GIAT DREAL to the additional diagnosis and management plan definitely an area established by BURGEAP

On November 13, 2009, at the time when the public inquiry for changes to the POS, the case of termination of business with the management plan is still under investigation by DREAL. The statement must be followed by a prefectural retirement.

2 - The planned rezoning subject to public inquiry

The proposed amendment is identical in areas UAA and UBC. This is old BPI "where the uses will be compatible with any residual pollution.

In these areas, it is expected to authorize "the construction and real estate transactions with private gardens and public areas or undeveloped, provided that their assignments and their use will be made compatible with residual pollution present on the base grounds.

In the area of industrial and commercial craft, ranked IU but destined to become UIB, the amendment provides authorization "structures whose uses are compatible with any residual pollution. These buildings would be permitted "without private garden, provided that their assignment is compatible with residual pollution on the ground attitude.
are therefore forbidden in the area UIB nurseries, kindergartens, schools the first degree, medical social educational institutions.

These data are complementary with respect to the current IU area.


3 - As it stands, several problematic aspects

Building permits have been secured and work undertaken before modification of the POS

[ Building permits:
¾ request of the City filed February 23, 2009 to organize the House Associations (Building 100).
The DREAL meets April 16: it can give an opinion "to the extent one or industrial use has been retained with appropriate measures and easements of drug use."
In addition, the procedure for termination of activity of GIAT is not over.
A resolution was proposed and passed by the City Council unless it has the elements of assessment.

¾ license granted by the City IRGC
City Council voted to transfer to RMC Building 119 and adjoining land. May 28 2009, DREAL finds that the intended use (the receipt of the public) "is not one defined by the former operator. In this case, she continues, "it belongs to the town of Tarbes to perform additional studies to validate the use of the future film is compatible with residual pollution.

¾ It would also be interesting to know items in the folder on the old tobacco store (southwest corner) which is currently implemented the service of municipal archives and where are trademarks collections and the Museum reserves Massey.

¾ Modification of SOP aims to open a portion of the urban site GIAT. The licensing would be framed by introducing into the regulation a notion of compatibility of use with residual pollution . However, the draft amendment of the SOP states that " up to the buyers to ensure that future use is compatible with residual pollution identified in the management plan for industrial .


[ Questions
¾ Why kept secret studies whose existence is known, including at the public inquiry?

¾ Why not have a plan for managing waste pollution in order to know the usage restrictions before selling lots, receiving the public, are not a industrial use?

¾ complementary investigations requested by the DREAL Are those reported in City Council?

¾ What offload responsibility on the contractors? How individuals, in relation to habitat, will they be informed, owners or tenants? City commits Does not his responsibility?

¾ What are the current work on the site?

¾ What remediation work conducted on the site? Are they limited to the demolition of the building 124 to the disposal and storage of excavated material according to their degree of pollution
> Class 3 when the pollution level is eligible
> treated as class 2 when they exceed those standards
> funding
> there any other cleanup?


[ Review:

For a sensitive use (habitat area), the thresholds of acceptability are exceeded:
¾ for occupation of the site of the former dump (around the water tower) by children and adults in a public facility
¾ for individual housing with or without recovery with garden soil on the site of the demolished building is currently 124
¾ a point in the building 116
¾ on the entire site for the use of individual gardens and green spaces without overlap (diffuse pollution: arsenic and lead).
> however, it is expected to authorize "the construction and real estate transactions with private gardens, with reference to compatibility with residual pollution.
> it would seem that the plan Management GIAT included measures of recovery (rail system infrastructure, buildings, renewal of the portion of green space by a layer of topsoil)
[ Nominations ANTHEA
¾ keeping blankets and recovery site
¾ when servitudes for treatment of pollution is not feasible, technically or economically.

[ result of the public inquiry launched by the city to change the SOP:

Initially, deal with technical problems, Ms. Hague investigating commissioner appointed to conduct the public inquiry, asked to have the assistance of a forensic expert .
Mr. Delmas has been designated by the Administrative Court of Pau to assist technically the investigating commissioner, helping to better understand procedures, interpretation of soil tests and recommendations for site development contained in the expert report.

Here are the remarks made by Mr. Delmas following its mission:

- in 2008, planning policy conducted by the city of Tarbes has changed, therefore residual pollution on some parcels of the site should be treated according to current standards for use sensitive
- this situation must to be managed in a strict and transparent framework based on a qualitative assessment of Health Risk (QHRA ) complete with all parcels of the site by the use to which they are for
- the QHRA, prospective management plan summary must be repeated and detailed with residual risk analysis, zone by zone, as usage fina l It should help produce a quantitative analysis of the risks or adverse effects from exposures to certain chemicals identified by the use envisaged .

[ Through these studies, Mr. Delmas said it would be possible to:

- quantify the effects associated with non-carcinogenic substances and excess risk associated with carcinogenic compounds
- recommend measures if necessary.

It concludes that this way, the legitimate concerns that generates for the public such an arrangement could be removed without seriously delaying the political and technical decisions that can be taken calmly.
In view of these remarks, Ms. Hague has finally issued an unfavorable opinion the sensitive site exploitation of previously developed land and buildings GIAT.
Indeed, the latter considered in the present state of things and given the evidence before it concerning remediation site, it only was not possible to rule in favor of the amendment to the SOP include creating habitat areas on the site.